Your free business.com+ membership unlocks exclusive tech deals and advisor support
Join Free
BDC Hamburger Icon

Menu

Close
BDC Logo with Name
Search Icon
Search Icon
Advertise with us
ArrowHiring
Advertising Disclosure
Close
Advertising Disclosure

Business.com aims to help business owners make informed decisions to support and grow their companies. We research and recommend products and services suitable for various business types, investing thousands of hours each year in this process.

As a business, we need to generate revenue to sustain our content. We have financial relationships with some companies we cover, earning commissions when readers purchase from our partners or share information about their needs. These relationships do not dictate our advice and recommendations. Our editorial team independently evaluates and recommends products and services based on their research and expertise. Learn more about our process and partners here.

How to Hire Employees in Other Countries With an EOR

Hiring internationally comes with logistics, compliance and tax challenges — but working with an EOR can make all that a lot easier to manage.

author image
Written by:
Adam Uzialko, Senior Editor
author image
Editor verified:
Chad Brooks,Managing Editor
Last Updated Jun 23, 2026
Business.com earns commissions from some listed providers. Editorial Guidelines.
Table Of Contents Icon

Table of Contents

Open row

This article is sponsored by Justworks. 

The best person for the job might live in Lisbon, Manila or São Paulo, and, for a growing number of small businesses, hiring those employees is no longer a hypothetical. Remote-first teams now recruit from talent pools that stretch well beyond their home country, competing for skilled people wherever they happen to be.

You have found the right candidate abroad, sent the offer and gotten a yes. Now, you have to navigate a foreign country’s labor laws, payroll system, tax authorities and benefits expectations. None of it works the way it does at home, and getting it wrong carries real legal and financial risk.

This is the problem an employer of record (EOR) solves. An EOR lets you hire full-time employees in countries where you have no legal entity of your own, handling compliance, payroll and benefits on your behalf. Below, we walk through when an EOR makes sense, how it compares to setting up your own entity and what to watch out for, using Justworks as a running example of how the model works in practice.

Three ways to hire internationally

Three ways to hire internationally

When a small business decides to hire someone in another country, there are broadly three paths available. Each comes with a different balance of speed, cost, control and risk.

1. Engage them as a contractor

Hiring an independent contractor is often the first step small businesses take because it is fast, flexible and requires little infrastructure. A contractor receives the gross amount you agree on and is responsible for filing and remitting their own taxes locally.

The catch is misclassification risk. If a worker you have labeled a contractor actually functions like an employee, working set hours, using your tools and taking direction from you, tax authorities can reclassify the relationship. Businesses found to have misclassified workers can owe back taxes and accrued benefits, plus fines and interest. As Justworks notes in its guide to global hiring, that long-term exposure is exactly what pushes many companies past the contractor stage.

2. Set up your own local entity

Establishing a legal entity in the target country gives you full control and a permanent local presence. It is also the slowest and most expensive option. Opening a business bank account alone can take several months in many countries, and without local legal expertise, compliance and bureaucratic hurdles can stretch the process further.

Beyond setup, you take on ongoing compliance for local tax filings, payroll, benefits administration and labor-law updates, all of which become your responsibility as the employer. Depending on the country, standing up and maintaining an entity can cost tens of thousands of dollars, or considerably more, before you account for the internal HR and legal support it requires.

3. Hire through an employer of record

An EOR is the middle path. The EOR already owns a legal entity in the country and acts as the official employer of your hire, while the person works directly for you and follows your direction day to day. You get the speed and flexibility of the contractor route with the compliance and employee experience of running your own entity, minus the time-consuming legal setup.

Bottom LineBottom line
Understanding the difference between hiring contractors, establishing a local entity and working with an EOR, even when hiring domestically, can help you make the best choice for your business.
  • Contractor: Fastest and cheapest to start, but carries misclassification risk if the person functions like an employee.
  • Own entity: Full control and permanent presence, but slow to establish and expensive to maintain.
  • EOR: Compliant employment without your own entity, typically the most practical option for a handful of hires per country.

When you need an EOR vs. a local entity

Both an EOR and your own entity let you employ people compliantly. Choosing between them comes down to a few practical factors.

  • How many people you are hiring in the country. For one to a few employees, an EOR is almost always more cost-effective. As your local headcount grows, the math can eventually favor owning an entity.
  • How long you expect to operate there. Testing a new market or making a single strategic hire points toward an EOR. A long-term, expanding presence may justify the investment of an entity.
  • Whether you want a permanent local footprint. If your goal is a branded, established presence in the country, with local leadership and infrastructure, an entity supports that in a way an EOR does not.

A common pattern is to start with an EOR to enter a market quickly, then build a local entity later if headcount and commitment grow enough to warrant it. The two approaches are not mutually exclusive; many companies move from one to the other as their needs evolve.

Handling local labor-law compliance

handling local labor laws compliance

Every country writes its own rules for employment, and they vary far more than most first-time international employers expect. Mandatory benefits, minimum notice periods, termination procedures, probationary terms and required contract clauses all differ by jurisdiction, and many are not optional or negotiable.

This is the core of what an EOR absorbs. Because the EOR is the legal employer, it drafts locally compliant employment contracts, onboards the employee under local rules and keeps up with regulatory changes so you don’t have to. With Justworks, for example, the company acts as the local entity and directly employs the individual, which means the legal and compliance responsibility for that employment sits with one party rather than being scattered across your team and a patchwork of local advisors.

It is worth understanding how different EOR providers are structured, because it affects compliance depth. Some providers route employment through third-party intermediaries in each country; others, such as Justworks, operate through their own owned entities and directly employ your hires. The owned-entity model reduces the number of middlemen between you and your employee, which can mean fewer points of failure when something needs to be fixed. 

Payroll and tax obligations

Running payroll in another country means more than converting a salary into local currency. As the employer, an EOR collects and remits local taxes on both the employer and employee side, handles statutory contributions, and pays employees on the local schedule and in their local currency.

How a provider delivers that payroll matters. Justworks frames the choice as falling into two broad categories: partner- or vendor-based models, where much of the work is outsourced to localized third parties, and entity-owned or direct models, where the provider employs and pays workers through its own entities. The direct approach, the company argues, reduces the number of intermediaries and the delays and errors that can come with them.

Cost predictability is part of this picture too. Before committing to a hire, you can estimate total employment costs by country using Justworks’ International Cost Calculator, which provides a breakdown of what an employee will actually cost once local taxes and contributions are included, so the numbers do not surprise you after the fact.

Benefits expectations by region

benefits of expectations by region

Benefits are where local norms become most visible, and where the gap between “legally required” and “competitive” matters most. Some benefits are statutory and non-negotiable; others are customary perks that strong candidates will nonetheless expect. The Philippines is a useful illustration of how layered this can get.

  • 13th-month pay. All employees in the Philippines receive a yearly 13th-month bonus equal to or more than one-twelfth of their base salary, as Justworks lays out in its Philippines hiring guide. This is not a performance bonus; it is a legally mandated payment, typically paid out around the end of the year.
  • Service incentive leave. Employees are entitled to at least five days of service incentive leave after one year of employment, usable for sick or personal time.
  • Universal healthcare (PhilHealth). The Philippines runs a universal healthcare system to which both employers and employees are required to contribute.

The 13th-month concept extends well beyond the Philippines. As Justworks explains in its overview of 13th-month pay, the bonus is deeply embedded in employment culture across Latin America, where it is known as the aguinaldo, and appears in parts of Europe as well. 

In some countries it is strictly mandatory; in others it is customary. Spain even allows employers to spread the payment across the year if the employment contract specifies it. The practical takeaway for an employer is that the same headline salary carries different real costs and obligations depending on where your employee sits, which is precisely the kind of local knowledge an EOR is built to supply.

What to look for in an EOR provider

Once you have decided an EOR is the right path, the providers themselves vary in ways that matter. A few criteria are worth weighing include:

  • How employment is structured. Owned-entity providers employ your hires directly; others work through local partners. Owned entities can offer tighter compliance control and a single point of accountability.
  • Country coverage. Make sure the provider actually supports the specific countries you are hiring in. Justworks, for example, supports EOR hiring in more than 40 countries and regions across the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Asia-Pacific.
  • Pricing transparency. Look for providers that let you understand total employment cost up front rather than quoting on request only.
  • Support quality. When a payroll or compliance issue arises in a country you do not operate in, responsive, knowledgeable support is what keeps a small problem from becoming a large one.
  • A unified platform. If you employ people both at home and abroad, managing domestic and international payroll on a single system reduces administrative overhead. Justworks runs its U.S. PEO and international EOR on one platform, so a company making its first international hires can use the same vendor and dashboard it already knows.

Global talent is genuinely within reach for small businesses, without the cost and multi-month timeline of establishing a foreign entity. An EOR handles the compliance, payroll and benefits machinery that makes international employment work, letting you focus on the people you are hiring rather than the bureaucracy around them. If you are weighing your first international hire, an EOR may be the right choice to streamline management and make sure your business stays compliant with local laws and tax requirements.

Did you find this content helpful?
Verified CheckThank you for your feedback!
author image
Written by: Adam Uzialko, Senior Editor
Adam Uzialko, the accomplished senior editor at Business News Daily, brings a wealth of experience that extends beyond traditional writing and editing roles. With a robust background as co-founder and managing editor of a digital marketing venture, his insights are steeped in the practicalities of small business management. At business.com, Adam contributes to our digital marketing coverage, providing guidance on everything from measuring campaign ROI to conducting a marketing analysis to using retargeting to boost conversions. Since 2015, Adam has also meticulously evaluated a myriad of small business solutions, including document management services and email and text message marketing software. His approach is hands-on; he not only tests the products firsthand but also engages in user interviews and direct dialogues with the companies behind them. Adam's expertise spans content strategy, editorial direction and adept team management, ensuring that his work resonates with entrepreneurs navigating the dynamic landscape of online commerce.