Business.com aims to help business owners make informed decisions to support and grow their companies. We research and recommend products and services suitable for various business types, investing thousands of hours each year in this process.
As a business, we need to generate revenue to sustain our content. We have financial relationships with some companies we cover, earning commissions when readers purchase from our partners or share information about their needs. These relationships do not dictate our advice and recommendations. Our editorial team independently evaluates and recommends products and services based on their research and expertise. Learn more about our process and partners here.
Although same-sex marriage is legal in all 50 states, domestic partner benefit laws still vary. Weigh the pros and cons of extending employee benefits to domestic partners.

In the landmark 2015 case Obergefell v. Hodges, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that same-sex couples have a constitutional right to marry, federally granting same-sex spouses access to the same type of legal rights and benefits that opposite-sex spouses have (e.g., tax relief, spousal benefits, domestic relations laws, inheritance rights). Naturally, this ruling was considered an overall “win” for same-sex marriage advocates. However, it also altered the legal landscape for some domestic partner benefits, especially since legalizing same-sex marriage doesn’t eliminate the need for domestic partner benefits.
Consider this scenario: What if couples in long-term domestic relationships choose not to marry, for whatever reason? Are companies legally required to offer employee benefits to those in common-law living arrangements, same-sex or not? We’re breaking down everything to know about granting domestic partner benefits to employees.
A domestic partnership is a type of relationship that grants a couple that lives together but wishes to remain unmarried access to similar legal rights that they would otherwise obtain by entering a marriage. Same-sex and opposite-sex couples can enter domestic partnerships, and these individuals often live together, raise children and split their finances the same way a married couple would.
There are no federal guidelines governing domestic partnerships; it’s left to the states to define any regulations. As a result, the recognition of domestic partnerships, what exactly constitutes one and what companies are legally obligated to cover in terms of benefits vary by city and state.
Domestic partner benefits are employee benefits extended to an employee’s domestic partner, similar to those provided to spouses. These benefits promote workplace inclusivity by recognizing committed relationships between couples who live together but are not legally married. Although domestic partner benefits can differ by state, city or jurisdiction, these are some common coverages an employer may offer an employee and their domestic partner:
Unlike spousal benefits, employer contributions toward domestic partner coverage are typically treated as taxable income for the employee. The exception occurs when the domestic partner qualifies as a tax dependent under IRS rules, which requires meeting specific criteria such as residing at the same address and receiving more than half their support from the employee.
Although the legalization of same-sex marriage benefited many, it had unintentional consequences for some employees in terms of the domestic partner benefits their employers continued to offer. With no federal law governing domestic partnerships, many businesses chose to do away with providing domestic partnership benefits altogether.
Previously, many employers extended domestic benefits coverage to same-sex couples only because these couples remained legally prohibited from marrying. After that changed, some of those business owners reverted to providing spousal benefits only. The argument is that the legalization of same-sex marriage now entitles everyone to the legal status of a spouse. Because it is no longer discriminatory, employers can elect to offer spousal benefits only and drop domestic partner benefits. In this view, the fact that some couples choose not to marry puts the legal burden not on employers but on the employees.
LGBTQ organization Human Rights Campaign advocates for the retention of domestic partnership benefits “as a sign of sustained commitment to family diversity, inclusion and protection of LGBT employees whose rights outside the workplace are not guaranteed under law in some states.”
Offering domestic partner benefits is not only beneficial to the affected employees and their partners, it can also be advantageous for employers. Here are some of the potential advantages of offering domestic partner benefits.
Recent workplace trends show that employees place a high priority on employee benefits when choosing which organization to work for. Domestic partner benefits can help create a well-rounded and inclusive benefits package that attracts workers.
Moreover, one trend among millennials, a key labor demographic, is cohabitation outside of marriage. A company that offers domestic partnership benefits might have a competitive recruiting edge over those that do not. This could also be an advantage for managing Generation Z in the workplace.
Similar to employee recruitment, offering domestic partner benefits can aid employee retention. By offering domestic partner benefits, your affected employees and their partners can receive benefits similar to their married colleagues. This level of support can encourage employee loyalty and appreciation.
Offering domestic partner benefits can boost efforts to promote an inclusive and equitable company culture. For example, if an employee isn’t “out” at work, requiring them to get married just to receive spousal benefits may, in effect, “out” them, causing them potential distress or unease.
Employers should aim to create a diverse and inclusive workplace and have fair policies that protect all LGBTQ employees. According to a 2024 Gallup poll, 7.6 percent of U.S. adults identify as LGBTQ+, with higher percentages among younger generations — making inclusive policies increasingly important for workforce engagement.
Another advantage of offering these benefits is optics. It can reflect the owner’s ethical values and enhance your company’s image as a socially progressive organization. This is a great way to build a reputation as a company that truly cares about its employees, which can be appealing to clients, customers and potential employees.
Why would a business not continue to extend domestic partner benefits to employees? Well, now that all people have equal access to marriage, companies stand to save a substantial amount of money and time by streamlining their benefits plans.
Determining domestic partner status can present administrative challenges, particularly for multi-state employers. The Mayo Clinic, for example, has 76,000 employees working in all 50 states — states with varying regulations on domestic partnership. According to the Star Tribune, the organization started phasing out same-sex domestic partnership benefits in those states where marriage had been legalized prior to the Supreme Court ruling. Then, with federal recognition, the director of the health system noted, “This makes it much easier for us. Now we’re applying the same rules across the organization.” The nonprofit gave employees a one-year grace period to get married to maintain their partner benefits.
In cases where companies offered domestic partner benefits to same-sex couples only, a potential legal consequence now seems moot, as accusations of discrimination based on sexual orientation can no longer take place where such laws are in effect. Now, ironically, if a business continues to offer domestic benefits exclusively to unmarried same-sex couples, it could be vulnerable to discrimination suits.
Whether businesses choose to defend themselves in court or extend the definition of domestic partnerships to include opposite-sex couples, this is an added complication and cost. Some owners may see more value in dropping domestic partnership benefits to make some of the possible downsides go away.
The decision to offer domestic partner benefits requires careful consideration of multiple factors. Start by reviewing your state and local requirements; while federal law does not require employers to offer domestic partner coverage, some states (such as Maine), counties and cities do have requirements, particularly for registered domestic partners or government contractors. Next, analyze your workforce demographics and recruitment needs. If you’re competing for talent in industries or regions where these benefits are standard, offering them may be essential for competitiveness.
Consider conducting an employee survey to gauge interest and need. Additionally, consult with your benefits broker or consultant to understand the actual cost implications. Many employers find the incremental cost is lower than anticipated due to limited enrollment.
For small companies, your decision either way may not be much of an issue. However, as your organization grows, having clear, consistent policies becomes increasingly important. Document your benefits eligibility criteria clearly, ensure your policies comply with applicable laws, and communicate any changes well in advance to allow employees time to adjust their personal arrangements.
