Business.com aims to help business owners make informed decisions to support and grow their companies. We research and recommend products and services suitable for various business types, investing thousands of hours each year in this process.
As a business, we need to generate revenue to sustain our content. We have financial relationships with some companies we cover, earning commissions when readers purchase from our partners or share information about their needs. These relationships do not dictate our advice and recommendations. Our editorial team independently evaluates and recommends products and services based on their research and expertise. Learn more about our process and partners here.
Results-only work environments can produce great results. However, it might not be optimal for every organization. Is it right for yours?
Long before remote work and flexible schedules became commonplace, two Best Buy employees developed and initiated an experiment in the early 2000s that they called a results-only work environment (ROWE) — an HR and management strategy that focuses solely on employee outcomes rather than when, where and how they work.
For roughly a decade, Best Buy’s corporate employees followed the plan laid out by ROWE creators Cali Ressler and Jody Thompson. Employees were given absolute freedom to work on their own terms and time, and their performance was measured only on the results they produced, not the amount of time they spent at their desks. Though Best Buy abandoned ROWE in 2013, Ressler and Thompson have publicly shared numerous positive results from their experiment, including an average of 35 percent higher productivity and 90 percent lower voluntary employee turnover rates.
In the post-pandemic world, many organizations, both large and small, have implemented successful work models inspired by ROWE. Here’s what you should know about the approach and how to determine whether it’s right for your business.
Designed to increase productivity while eliminating the arbitrary constraints of traditional workplaces, a results-only work environment model measures employee performance solely on results delivered. Salaried employees don’t need to work a certain number of hours or even come into an office, so long as they meet their performance metrics. They have complete autonomy over their projects, including how they want to work on them and how much time they dedicate to them.
Brandon Dawson, co-founder and CEO of Cardone Ventures, is a big believer in ROWE because “time doesn’t scale, but results do.” Dawson told Business.com that “in a ROWE, your top people rise — and your business grows with them. I’ve seen teams become dramatically more productive and more energized because they have clarity, autonomy and direct alignment with outcomes.”
ROWEs fall under the umbrella of flextime policies that many employers have implemented in recent years. These work models eschew the standard “9-to-5” schedule and give workers more freedom in their working hours and, in some cases, the days they work. “The benefit [of ROWE] is obvious,” said JW Roth, CEO of VENU. “People get to do great work on their terms, which builds trust and often leads to better results.”
ROWEs have clear benefits for both employers and employees. However, this work model also comes with potential drawbacks that organizations should consider. When determining whether it’s right for your business, take the time to weigh the pros and cons in relation to your company’s needs.
Under ideal conditions, a results-only work environment creates a stronger, more engaged and more productive team. Here are some key advantages for businesses that implement it.
Despite its benefits, ROWE isn’t a good fit for every company. Here are the biggest drawbacks to this model:
Businesses will find that many top competitors follow a ROWE model despite some drawbacks. These companies believe that making employees have a stake in their success will benefit everyone from top to bottom. Companies that started or changed over to a ROWE model include WATT Global Media, JL Buchanan, World Wide Webhosting and Summit CPA. The most well-known ROWE Fortune 100 company is Best Buy.
Moving to a results-only work environment requires leaders to be intentional about goal-setting, communication and accountability. Here’s how experts recommend setting up your ROWE and managing employee performance.
Every role in a ROWE needs defined outcomes and ways to measure them. Dawson recommended setting measurable, time-bound targets and aligning them with personal and business goals. This creates shared accountability and helps employees see how their individual success contributes to the company’s growth.
In a ROWE, clarity is essential, and it starts with strong communication habits. “Any [ROWE] organization [should have] documented and accessible goals, transparent and frequent updates and an organizational culture that prioritizes asynchronous communication skills,” Wandtke said.
According to Roth, an important component of this communication is getting aligned and setting your team up for success. “Check-ins shouldn’t be about, ‘What did you do today?’” Roth said. “They should be about, ‘Are we on track and what do you need to succeed?’”
In many cases, results-only workplaces create happier, more productive employees — and, as research has shown, happy employees are good for business. However, ROWE isn’t right for every organization. The most crucial factor in deciding whether ROWE will work for you is knowing your business and your employees.
ROWE works best when you have a team of self-starters who are motivated by results. If someone needs constant supervision or isn’t interested in personal or professional growth, they’re unlikely to thrive in this model. “If someone isn’t interested in their own goals and winning, they definitely won’t be interested in the company’s or [their] teammates’ goals,” Dawson warned.
Roth noted that the mindset required to succeed in a ROWE is a shift, and “not everyone’s ready for it.” However, if you’re building the right kind of culture, it can produce great results. “Accountability isn’t about control — it’s about clarity, consistency and trust,” Roth said. “When you build that kind of culture, the scoreboard takes care of itself.”
Sean Peek contributed to the reporting and writing in this article.