Business.com aims to help business owners make informed decisions to support and grow their companies. We research and recommend products and services suitable for various business types, investing thousands of hours each year in this process.
As a business, we need to generate revenue to sustain our content. We have financial relationships with some companies we cover, earning commissions when readers purchase from our partners or share information about their needs. These relationships do not dictate our advice and recommendations. Our editorial team independently evaluates and recommends products and services based on their research and expertise. Learn more about our process and partners here.
Workplace nepotism can undermine trust, hurt morale and drive good employees away. Here's how to recognize it and stop it before it causes real damage.

Have you ever worked somewhere that felt unfair? Maybe certain employees seemed to get internal promotions, flexibility or special treatment no matter how they performed, while everyone else had to work twice as hard just to be noticed. That kind of double standard is frustrating and demoralizing. When employees put in the effort and deliver results, they expect to be evaluated on merit. But in some organizations, personal relationships quietly shape hiring and promotion decisions. That practice, known as nepotism, can tilt the playing field and erode confidence in leadership.
Left unchecked, nepotism doesn’t just create resentment. It can damage morale, lower productivity and push formerly highly motivated employees out the door. Understanding how nepotism shows up — and how to prevent it — is key to building a workplace that feels fair, transparent and worth investing in.

Nepotism is the practice of giving preferential treatment to relatives or close personal connections, especially when it comes to jobs, promotions or other opportunities. In a workplace setting, nepotism occurs when personal relationships influence hiring, advancement or day-to-day decisions, often at the expense of fairness and business transparency.
That favoritism can take many forms, including:
Erica Salmon Byrne, chief strategy officer and executive chair at Ethisphere, offered a straightforward example: If a hiring manager fills an open role by quietly hiring a family member — without posting the job or considering other candidates — that’s a clear case of nepotism.
Research shows just how common — and impactful — these dynamics can be. Widely cited findings from Opportunity Insights, Harvard’s economic mobility research group, indicate that nearly one-third of Americans will work at the same company as a parent by age 30. In those cases, young workers earn about 20 percent higher wages than their peers without the same connections.

While nepotism isn’t illegal in most private-sector workplaces, it’s widely considered one of the most damaging management practices an organization can allow. Even when favoritism is subtle or unintentional, it can undermine trust, weaken business decision-making and erode company culture.
Research shows how quickly unfairness can take a toll. A study from MIT Sloan Management Review found that employees are more likely to leave because of a toxic workplace culture, especially when they feel excluded or treated unfairly, than because of pay issues. That aligns with iHire’s 2025 Toxic Workplace Trends Report, which found that nearly 75 percent of employees have experienced a toxic workplace, with favoritism cited as a top source of unfair treatment.
Here are some specific ways nepotism can negatively affect a business:

Preventing nepotism starts with clarity. Employees need to understand that decisions around hiring, promotions and assignments are based on merit, not personal relationships. That requires clear policies, consistent practices and an ethical workplace culture that values fairness and accountability.
Here are several practical ways to reduce the risk of nepotism in your organization.
A written anti-nepotism policy sets expectations from the start. Include it in your employee handbook and review it as part of manager training so leaders understand both the rules and the reasoning behind them.
An effective policy doesn’t have to ban hiring family members outright. Instead, it should require employees to disclose personal relationships that could create conflicts of interest and establish guardrails for how those situations are handled. As Salmon Byrne noted, disclosure helps organizations manage — and avoid — the appearance of favoritism before it becomes a problem.
Many policies go further by limiting how closely related employees can work together. For example, they may prohibit family members from working in the same department or reporting directly to one another.
“It’s not like great, big, giant, enormous policies, but just some written policies that say, ‘Hey, when you come to work here, we expect you to put the company first,'” Salmon Byrne explained. “‘That means that you can’t act in a way that appears to preference your interests over ours, and here are some ways that can happen.'”
Clear job titles and descriptions are one of the simplest ways to guard against nepotism. When every role has defined requirements, it’s easier to evaluate candidates objectively and hold leadership accountable for hiring and promotion decisions.
Each job description should clearly outline the role’s responsibilities, required experience and expected skills, both technical and interpersonal. This ensures all candidates are measured against the same criteria and helps prevent exceptions or “customized” roles that quietly favor certain individuals.
Well-written job descriptions also make it easier to explain decisions to employees, which reinforces transparency and trust across the organization.
Manager and leadership training play a critical role in preventing nepotism. Policies and job descriptions only go so far if the people making day-to-day decisions don’t understand where the lines are or feel accountable for enforcing them.
Training should clearly define what nepotism looks like in practice, using real-world examples rather than abstract rules. Managers should understand that they’re responsible not only for avoiding favoritism themselves, but also for speaking up when they see it elsewhere in the organization.
Salmon Byrne recommends using storytelling to make those expectations clear. Walking through examples of how nepotism led to poor outcomes, even at peer companies, helps managers and employees understand why these policies exist in the first place.
“Use that storytelling to explain to your employees why you have this policy in the first place and why it’s important that they follow it,” Salmon Byrne said. “And then make it really, really easy for them to tell you when they have a conflict, because so many conflicts can be mitigated by disclosure.”
Transparency is one of the most effective ways to prevent nepotism. When employees understand how hiring and promotion decisions are made, they’re far more likely to trust the outcome even if they’re not the ones selected.
That means clearly documenting advancement criteria, explaining how candidates are evaluated and communicating decisions openly when possible. Decisions about hiring and staffing your business shouldn’t feel mysterious or improvised. If employees don’t understand how decisions are made, they often assume the worst. Clear, transparent processes show that performance and qualifications matter, which reduces anxiety and helps create a healthier workplace.
A transparent process helps reinforce the message that advancement is based on performance and qualifications, not personal relationships. Over time, that clarity strengthens trust, reduces anxiety and supports a healthier workplace culture.
Adding an extra layer of review can go a long way toward preventing favoritism. Involving HR or a senior management group in hiring and promotion decisions helps ensure choices are based on consistent, objective criteria, not personal relationships.
HR departments are often well-positioned to spot potential conflicts of interest and ask the right questions before a decision is finalized. For smaller businesses without HR, an extra set of eyes from senior leadership or a neutral group can help keep hiring and promotion decisions fair, particularly for leadership roles.
Caddell emphasized the importance of structured evaluation over individual opinion. “You can build an objective standard that people have to meet, like a scoring criterion that a hiring committee has to stick to, so it’s not just one person’s opinion, and people can’t jump to the front of the line,” Caddell explained.
Nepotism doesn’t always look the same. In most workplaces, it tends to fall into one of two broad categories. While both lead to unfair advantages, they’re driven by different motivations.
Nepotism doesn’t always show up as an obvious rule break. More often, it appears as small patterns of favoritism that slowly undermine trust and morale. While these behaviors may seem minor on their own, they can be just as damaging as more blatant misconduct.
Common examples include:
Nepotism often starts quietly, but the damage adds up fast. When team members think relationships matter more than performance, trust breaks down and employee engagement drops. Over time, that hurts retention and credibility for managers and company leadership.
The good news is that nepotism is preventable. Clear policies, consistent processes and accountable leadership help create a workplace where employees believe effort and results matter. As Caddell put it, “It’s very hard to create a trusting environment with nepotism in place. And without trust, you’re not going to get high performance from your teams.”
For business owners, addressing nepotism isn’t just about avoiding problems — it’s about building a culture people want to stay in and grow with.
Erin Donaghue and Jennifer Dublino contributed to this article.
