Business.com aims to help business owners make informed decisions to support and grow their companies. We research and recommend products and services suitable for various business types, investing thousands of hours each year in this process.
As a business, we need to generate revenue to sustain our content. We have financial relationships with some companies we cover, earning commissions when readers purchase from our partners or share information about their needs. These relationships do not dictate our advice and recommendations. Our editorial team independently evaluates and recommends products and services based on their research and expertise. Learn more about our process and partners here.
Microsoft and Amazon are two of the leading cloud-based infrastructure as a service providers. Which one is right for your business?

As more companies shift their operations to the cloud, choosing the right provider has become a major decision that affects everything from scalability to performance to long-term costs. Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Microsoft Azure are two of the most widely used infrastructure-as-a-service (IaaS) platforms, and together they account for about half of the global cloud infrastructure market.
AWS offers a vast, mature ecosystem with one of the largest marketplaces of tools and partners, built on a primarily open-source foundation. Azure, on the other hand, stands out for its tight Microsoft integration and enterprise-friendly features, especially for organizations already running Windows, Office 365 or Active Directory. We’ll break down the key differences to help you determine which cloud platform best supports your business needs.
AWS offers more than 200 fully featured services across its global cloud infrastructure. These capabilities span nearly every part of modern IT and business operations, with core categories that include:
Microsoft Azure provides over 200 products and cloud services designed to help businesses solve today’s challenges and build for the future. Here are the primary service categories Azure offers:
AWS and Microsoft Azure share many similarities, but they also differ in pricing models, integrations and how they handle key cloud workloads. The sections below break down how the two platforms compare across the areas that matter most to businesses.
AWS and Azure offer parallel services across most major cloud categories. Here’s a side-by-side look at how their core offerings compare:
Category | AWS Service | Azure Service |
|---|---|---|
Compute | EC2 | Virtual Machines |
Serverless | Lambda | Functions |
Container Orchestration | ECS / EKS | Container Instances / AKS |
Object Storage | S3 | Blob Storage |
Block Storage | EBS | Managed Disks |
File Storage | EFS | Azure Files |
Relational Database | RDS | SQL Database |
NoSQL Database | DynamoDB | Cosmos DB |
Content Delivery (CDN) | CloudFront | Azure CDN |
Load Balancing | ELB / ALB | Load Balancer / Application Gateway |
Machine Learning | SageMaker | Azure Machine Learning |
IoT Platform | IoT Core | IoT Core |
Verdict: AWS offers the broader and more mature portfolio of cloud services, while Azure excels in identity, productivity and enterprise integrations. If your business needs maximum service depth and global reach, AWS has the edge; if you’re heavily invested in Microsoft, Azure delivers a more seamless environment.
Pricing is one of the biggest factors businesses weigh when choosing between AWS and Azure. Both platforms use a pay-as-you-go model for most services, with steep discounts available for long-term commitments or spare-capacity options.
However, actual costs can vary widely based on factors like region, workload type, storage tier, data transfer needs and how efficiently your team provisions and scales resources day to day.
AWS Pricing
Azure Pricing
Verdict: Pricing is comparable across both platforms, but the better value depends on your workload patterns. AWS offers broader flexibility for variable workloads, while Azure delivers strong savings for businesses already invested in Microsoft licensing. Actual costs come down to how well your team manages resource usage on either platform.
Microsoft’s licensing rules can have a major impact on your cloud costs, especially if you’re running Windows Server or SQL Server. Here’s how License Mobility and Microsoft’s bring-your-own-license (BYOL) rules apply to AWS and Azure.
License Mobility on AWS
Here’s what you can bring — these licenses are eligible for Microsoft’s License Mobility through Software Assurance:
(All eligible products are listed under Microsoft’s License Mobility program.)
Here’s what you can’t bring — these licenses are not eligible for License Mobility:
While Windows Server isn’t eligible for License Mobility, customers can use qualifying Windows Server and SQL Server licenses on AWS Dedicated Hosts under Microsoft’s BYOL rules. This applies only to dedicated hardware and requires compliance with Microsoft’s Product Terms. Learn more in AWS’s guide to bringing existing Microsoft licenses to Amazon EC2.
License Mobility on Azure
What you can bring — Azure supports all the same License Mobility-eligible products as AWS:
Azure also offers two exclusive advantages for Microsoft workloads:
These benefits let businesses apply existing licenses to Azure VMs, significantly reducing compute costs, especially for Windows-heavy environments.
What you can’t bring — these licenses are not eligible for License Mobility:
Like AWS, Azure also allows Windows Server and SQL Server licenses to run on Azure Dedicated Host under BYOL rules for dedicated hardware.
Verdict: Both platforms support Microsoft’s License Mobility benefits, but Azure has a structural advantage thanks to Azure Hybrid Benefit and first-party licensing alignment. AWS remains fully viable for SQL Server-heavy workloads, but Windows-heavy shops may find lower total licensing costs on Azure.
As hybrid and multicloud adoption grows, both AWS and Microsoft Azure offer robust solutions for companies running workloads across on-premises environments and the cloud.
AWS
AWS Outposts brings native AWS services, hardware and operational models directly into your data center or on-premises facility. Outposts uses the same infrastructure found in AWS Regions, starting with a single 42U rack configuration, to deliver a consistent hybrid experience.
AWS also extends its container orchestration services on customer-managed hardware through ECS Anywhere and EKS Anywhere, allowing teams to run containerized workloads outside the AWS cloud with centralized governance.
Azure
Azure Local (formerly part of the Azure Stack family) provides a hyperconverged infrastructure solution for running virtual machines, containers and select Azure services on-premises with native integration into Azure’s management tools and APIs. Unlike AWS Outposts, Azure Local runs on validated hardware from multiple OEM vendors — including Dell, HPE and Lenovo — and supports flexible deployments from small configurations to larger clusters. Production environments require a minimum two-node cluster, with disconnected operations available in preview.
Azure Arc expands Azure’s management plane across any environment, enabling unified governance and policy control across on-premises systems, edge deployments and even other cloud providers. Because Arc is built into Azure Local, customers get consistent tooling whether they’re managing Azure, AWS or on-premises resources.
Verdict: AWS excels at delivering a consistent hybrid experience using its own infrastructure, while Azure offers broader multicloud management through Azure Arc. If you need deep AWS integration on-prem, choose Outposts; if you want unified governance across clouds, Azure is the stronger fit.
Both AWS GovCloud and Azure Government offer isolated cloud environments built for government agencies and highly regulated workloads.
Verdict: AWS GovCloud is ideal if you want the widest service availability in a U.S.-sovereign environment, while Azure Government is the stronger fit for agencies already standardized on Microsoft tools and hybrid governance.
The open-source landscape has shifted significantly in recent years.
Verdict: AWS still has the broader open-source ecosystem and deeper managed OSS offerings, but Azure has closed much of the historical gap, making both platforms strong choices depending on your workloads and developer stack.
While AWS and Azure dominate the cloud market, Google Cloud Platform (GCP) has firmly established itself as the third-largest provider, now holding about 13 percent of the global cloud infrastructure market share. GCP stands out for its leadership in data analytics, machine learning, and Kubernetes orchestration, making it an attractive option for organizations with data-heavy or container-centric workloads.
Beyond the “big three,” additional platforms may fit niche or industry-specific needs. IBM Cloud and Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) offer compelling solutions for specialized workloads, while SAP Business Technology Platform supports enterprises running SAP applications.
OCI in particular has gained traction with businesses already invested in the Oracle ecosystem. Its tight integration with products like Oracle NetSuite (as noted in our NetSuite accounting software review) makes it especially appealing for companies standardizing on Oracle. OCI is also known for competitive pricing and strong performance for database workloads, especially its Autonomous Database and high-bandwidth networking options.
Both AWS and Azure offer generous free tiers to help businesses test their services before committing.
When evaluating either platform, focus on testing your real-world scenarios. Spin up a proof of concept that mirrors your production environment, experiment with the management consoles, check how easily each platform integrates with the tools you already use, and calculate total cost of ownership — including data egress, support fees and how efficiently your team manages resources.
And if AWS ultimately isn’t the right cloud fit, the features of Amazon Business may still be worth exploring. We’re pretty sure Microsoft won’t mind.
