Business.com aims to help business owners make informed decisions to support and grow their companies. We research and recommend products and services suitable for various business types, investing thousands of hours each year in this process.
As a business, we need to generate revenue to sustain our content. We have financial relationships with some companies we cover, earning commissions when readers purchase from our partners or share information about their needs. These relationships do not dictate our advice and recommendations. Our editorial team independently evaluates and recommends products and services based on their research and expertise. Learn more about our process and partners here.
The management theory of academic George Elton Mayo can help you build more productive teams.
George Elton Mayo was an Australian-born professor of industrial research who taught at Harvard Business School from the 1920s through the 1940s. Mayo is considered the founder of the human relations (HR) movement, and his contributions to the field have earned him the title of “father of the human relations movement.” Mayo used a science-based approach to disprove that employees were inherently lazy. His HR theory continues to shape how modern workplaces are managed.
Mayo’s influence emerged from his time at Harvard, where he led landmark research into worker productivity and organizational behavior. Before Mayo’s work in HR, the prevailing theory in workplace productivity and management was that workers were primarily motivated by pay. Therefore, employees’ human needs were widely disregarded by businesses. Mayo’s career and scholarship helped pivot management toward understanding motivation as social and psychological, not only economic — laying the groundwork for people-centric management.

Based on his well-known Hawthorne experiments, Mayo’s HR management theory grew from his observations of employee productivity levels under varying environmental conditions. His experiments drew a number of conclusions about the real source of employee motivation, laying the groundwork for later approaches to team building and group dynamics.
Mayo’s management theory holds that employees are motivated far more by relational factors — such as attention and camaraderie — than by monetary rewards or environmental conditions like lighting and humidity. This insight was a significant departure from the transactional view of labor that dominated his era.
Mayo developed a matrix to illustrate the likelihood that a given team would be successful. His matrix demonstrates the role that varying combinations of group norms and group cohesiveness play in team effectiveness. [Read related: 5 Reasons Why Teamwork Is Crucial to Workplace Success]
This video breaks down Elton Mayo’s research and how it changed workplace management.
Mayo’s theory identifies a “norm” through the degree to which a group encourages positive or negative behaviors. This is typically expressed through an employee handbook or workplace policies and can include formal or informal rules.
Group cohesiveness is how a unit cooperates together. It’s defined as a group’s overall camaraderie or level of teamwork.
The following are the four combinations of a group’s norm in relation to its cohesiveness:
The Hawthorne Studies were a series of experiments conducted at Western Electric’s Hawthorne Works in the late 1920s-early 1930s to examine how workplace conditions affected employee productivity. Researchers varied factors like lighting and rest breaks, then discovered that social dynamics, managerial attention and group norms were critical drivers of performance.
Here are some of the key findings of the Hawthorne Studies:
Mayo’s insights translate directly into today’s people-first management philosophy, where social connection, recognition and team cohesion drive performance, retention and resilience.
As Jim Camp Jr, former military professional and owner of Camp Negotiation System Group, told us, “Small business leaders who embrace Elton Mayo’s management theory improve their chances for success. Although it’s tempting to measure success by focusing on the bottom line, paying close attention to your people is a must.”
The following subsections show how human relations principles deliver practical outcomes for small businesses, from efficiency gains to healthier cultures and lower burnout.
The core premise of Mayo’s theory is that relational factors are better motivators than simply increasing employee pay. This is beneficial to small businesses since their payroll potential is typically limited.
Adrien Kallel, managing director of Remote People, agreed with this sentiment by stating that workplace productivity is directly linked to social relationships and group dynamics, while physical conditions are merely secondary. “Small businesses can take advantage of this, fostering strong team connections, leading to increased output and innovation without significant financial investment,” Kallel said.
When employees feel empowered to voice concerns and frustrations, managers can address issues before they snowball into massive problems.
“Mayo’s focus on group dynamics enables more effective collaborative problem-solving,” Kallel said. “When employees feel socially connected, they share information more freely and contribute diverse perspectives, creating robust solutions to business challenges.”
Employees can also typically identify production or customer service issues before management becomes aware of them. By maintaining a consistent, open communication channel between staff and leadership — a cornerstone of Mayo’s management theory — businesses can respond faster and more effectively when problems arise.
To implement Mayo’s theory, a small business must have managers who are capable of engaging with employees on a regular basis. Managers utilizing Mayo’s theory may be seen as more approachable and provide greater contributions to the overall success of the business.
For example, Kallel said that managers can develop their ability to recognize social patterns, facilitate team cohesion and address interpersonal challenges before they impact productivity.
An employee who feels emotionally connected to a business is far more likely to stay than one who doesn’t. This increase in employee retention will significantly reduce the amount of money a small business will need to invest in hiring efforts.
“Mayo’s emphasis on worker satisfaction through social integration creates stronger organizational loyalty, valuable for small companies where replacement costs are proportionally higher,” Kallel said.
Mayo’s theory relies on engaging with employees on personal matters. The ability to speak openly about frustrations and search for solutions will lead to a healthier work environment.
“Fostering an environment where your teammates know that you truly care or, as Mayo calls it the Hawthorne effect, will lead to more overall job satisfaction,” Camp said. “Employees who are comfortable communicating with their boss will help the leader hear what they need to hear, which isn’t always what they want to hear.”
Teamwork and cohesion don’t happen by accident. The leader is responsible for creating an environment of trust and respect, Camp said.
Burnout is a significant problem for employers today. More than half of U.S. workers feel burnout, according to research from Eagle Hill Consulting. There are many ways to prevent burnout, and implementing Mayo’s human relations management theory is one of them. Mayo’s theory reduces burnout and relieves staff shortages by creating more cohesive teams and camaraderie.

There are many ways that a small business can use Mayo’s HR theory. Here are 10 top strategies that you can implement immediately:
Consider the many benefits of putting the Mayo management theory to work for your business. If you decide to use it, why not go all out and practice it in all the areas it can effectively address: your own leadership of the company, your managers’ development and your employees’ engagement.
Although Mayo’s management theory is widely used in business, it’s not the only theory at your disposal. Here are a few other popular management theories that small businesses can explore.
Henry Mintzberg’s management theory centers around defining clear organizational structures and roles to enhance business efficiency. It identifies five distinct organizational structures and posits that effective management skills are gained through experience rather than classroom learning. Mintzberg’s theory helps businesses streamline operations, improve employee engagement and align roles with strengths and workflow. By choosing an appropriate structure, small businesses can resolve conflicts and optimize performance based on their specific needs and goals.
>> Learn more: The Management Theory of Henry Mintzberg
Frederick Taylor advocated for increasing productivity by scientifically analyzing tasks, rewarding workers for higher output and fostering cooperation rather than individualism. Taylor’s management theory, outlined in his 1911 book “The Principles of Scientific Management,” prioritizes industrial efficiency through job simplification and systematic management. Its key principles focus on science over guesswork, harmony over conflict and maximum output. While not universally applicable, his methods can be adapted to increase efficiency and collaboration in various businesses.
>> Learn more: The Management Theory of Frederick Taylor
Known for its bureaucratic approach, Max Weber’s management theory advocates for a structured and efficient organization through strict rules and a clear distribution of power. Weber believed that bureaucracy ensures maximum productivity by enforcing uniformity, precision and a hierarchical management system. In this ideal model, roles are defined by expertise, advancement is merit-based and work relationships remain professional and impersonal. Weber’s theory emphasizes efficiency and fairness, which can benefit businesses by implementing clear rules and well-defined roles.
>> Learn more: The Management Theory of Max Weber
Henri Fayol’s management theory suggests that effective management involves planning, organizing, leadership and controlling organizational resources. Fayol proposed 14 principles of management, including division of work, authority, discipline and unity of command, which aim to improve organizational efficiency. His theory highlights the importance of managerial functions — along with the need for clear organizational structure and hierarchy — for small businesses to achieve peak performance.
>> Learn more: The Management Theory of Henri Fayol
Mary Parker Follett’s management theory highlights the importance of coordination, collaboration and employee engagement within organizations. She advocated for a participative approach, where managers and employees work together to achieve common goals and solve problems. This management theory, particularly its focus on coordination and employee engagement, remains relevant to today’s businesses.
>> Learn more: The Management Theory of Mary Parker Follett
The Frank and Lillian Gilbreth management theory focuses on workplace efficiency through standardization and consistency. The husband-and-wife team believed in finding “one best way” to perform tasks, minimizing unnecessary motions and time to increase productivity. Their approach sought to streamline processes, increase profits and ensure a healthy work environment. It puts an emphasis on practical workspace and procedural improvements.
>> Learn more: The Management Theory of Frank and Lillian Gilbreth
Rosabeth Moss Kanter’s management theory focuses on the importance of empowerment and innovation in organizations. Kanter advocated for creating a supportive environment where employees have access to resources, autonomy and opportunities for growth. Her theory emphasizes fostering a culture that encourages participation, creativity and collaboration, which in turn drives organizational success and adaptability.
>> Learn more: The Management Theory of Rosabeth Moss Kanter
Source interviews were conducted for a previous version of this article.